Skip links and keyboard navigation

Western Cape and Gulf Freshwater Biogeographic Province

Western Cape and Gulf Freshwater Biogeographic Province – Habitat

Wet season (Jan-Mar) Average temperature (25°) Temperature varies along a west east gradient Width of riparian zone (37m) Small trees Grasses Low relief ratio Percentage of water which is base flow (8%) Annual spate duration (1 month) Annual no-flow duration (7 months) Sandstone Clay High macroinvertebrate richness Turbidity variable through region Turbidity variable through region Large woody debris cover (8%) Submerged and emergent macrophyte growth forms dominant Concave bank shape category Convex bank shape category Dominant bank slope (10°-80°) Fauna Fauna

Click on elements of the model or select from the tabs below

Bank shape and slope

Bank slope example, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

State of the Rivers survey data from 221 reference sites show that all bank slope categories are present in the FBP.  Steep, moderate and low slopes are the predominant categories.  They occur at 30% of the sites, and represent the dominant categories at 20-30% of sites.  All shape categories also occur, the concave and convex classes are most common.  In contrast undercut banks occur least frequently (<10% of sites).

 

Bank shape and slope

Methods

% sites present % sites dominant % sites not dominant
Bank slope
Vertical (80 - 90°) 13 10 3
Steep (60 - 80°) 31 21 10
Moderate (30 - 60°) 40 29 11
Low (10 - 30°) 49 30 19
Flat (< 10°) 19 9 10
Bank shape
Concave 54 40 14
Convex 54 27 17
Stepped 22 15 7
Wide lower bench 13 8 5
Undercut 4 3 1

Riparian vegetation and macrophyte (aquatic plant)

Riparian vegetation, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

Riparian vegetation, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

State of the Rivers survey data from 221 reference sites in the FBP show that the average width of riparian zones is approximately 37 m.  Grasses, medium trees and small trees typically dominate riparian vegetation cover.  Trees over 30 m tall, woody shrubs, ferns, mosses, and palms typically form very minor components of riparian cover and vines, tree ferns, mosses and palms are typically absent.  On average 23% of riparian zones are bare of vegetation.

Vegetation type varies across the FBP.  In the Cape York Peninsula to the north of the FBP the most extensive vegetation types are woodlands dominated by Eucalyptus tetrodonta, bloodwoods (Corymbia nesophila, C. hylandii, C. clarksoniana), and Melaleuca viridiflora [1].  In contrast the Mitchell Grass Downs contain a high diversity of arid zone fauna, including species which have developed specialisation for high temperatures and deep cracking soils[1].

 

Riparian vegetation and macrophytes

Methods

Riparian vegetation cover Mean SE Maximum Minimum
Riparian zone width (m) 36.687 4.381 525 0
Bare of vegetation (%) 23.441 1.137 80 0
Trees > 30 m tall (%) 1.495 0.403 75 0
Trees 10 - 30 m (%) 17.894 1.106 80 0
Trees < 10 m (%) 31.968 1.427 100 0
Woody shrubs > 2 m (%) 3.878 0.374 27.5 0
Woody shrubs < 2 m (%) 5.971 0.523 45 0
Vines (%) 3.027 0.569 77.5 0
Rushes & sedges (%) 0.765 0.181 25 0
Herbs & forbs (%) 2.068 0.335 35 0
Grasses (%) 39.538 1.709 92.5 0
Tree ferns (%) 0.090 0.071 15 0
Ferns (%) 0.095 0.091 20 0
Mosses (%) 0.208 0.182 40 0
Palms (%) 0.104 0.051 10 0

Macrophyte (aquatic plant)

State of the Rivers survey data from 221 reference sites in the FBP show that macrophytes were present at 34% of sites in the FBP.  Mean total cover was 6%, with submerged and emergent macrophytes being most frequently observed, present at 21 and 18% of sites respectively.

Macrophyte cover % sites present Mean SE Maximum Minimum
submerged (%) 21.267 6.281 1.192 95 0
floating (%) 4.525 0.706 0.257 30 0
emergent (%) 18.552 3.878 0.755 60 0
total (%) 34.389 10.864 1.443 - -

 

Substrate composition and heterogeneity

Wallabadah waterhole, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

The number of substrate classes recorded is high with respect to most other FBPs in Queensland. Edge habitat averaged 2.7 classes, pool habitat 3.3 classes, and riffle habitat averaged almost four.  In all habitat types each class was represented repeatedly.

  • Edge habitat is dominated by sand, though silt/clay occurs frequently, and smaller hard substrates (cobble, boulder) typically present as only minor components. At some sites bedrock, sand and silt/clay are the only substrate classes present but no class is present at all sites.
  • Pool bed material is dominated by sand, but bedrock and gravel are also typically common (>10%), while boulder, cobble, pebble, and silt/clay are relatively uncommon (<10%). At some sites bedrock, silt/clay and sand are the only substrate class present but no class is present at all sites.
  • Riffles contain a mixture of cobble, pebble, gravel, and sand though are not dominated by any one substrate type. Silt/clay and boulder are very minor components and bedrock is a relatively minor component. Despite this at some sites bedrock composes 95% of the substrate but no class is present at all sites.

Substrate heterogeneity is consistent between habitat types and is high compared to other FBPs in Queensland.

 

Substrate composition and heterogeneity

Methods

 

Habitat
substrate class
Mean SE Maximum Minimum Chart
Edge          
Bedrock (%)
4.333 0.951 100 0
Boulder (%)
1.689 0.483 80 0
Cobble (%)
1.737 0.352 40 0
Pebble (%)
2.667 0.585 90 0
Gravel (%)
8.611 0.753 80 0
Sand (%)
56.593 1.737 100 0
Silt/Clay (%)
24.370 1.545 100 0
No. Classes
2.741 0.069 7 1
Heterogeneity
0.698 0.023 1.805 0
Pool          
Bedrock (%)
10.246 2.126 100 0
Boulder (%)
3.041 0.742 50 0
Cobble (%)
8.033 1.564 80 0
Pebble (%)
8.811 1.305 75 0
Gravel (%)
17.336 1.733 100 0
Sand (%)
44.672 2.761 100 0
Silt/Clay (%)
7.943 1.275 100 0
No. Classes
3.311 0.122 7 1
Heterogeneity
0.864 0.038 1.848 0
Riffle          
Bedrock (%)
7.931 1.973 95 0
Boulder (%)
2.802 0.657 40 0
Cobble (%)
20.086 2.235 90 0
Pebble (%)
16.853 1.343 70 0
Gravel (%)
20.948 1.583 85 0
Sand (%)
27.974 2.218 100 0
Silt/Clay (%)
3.405 0.710 60 0
No. Classes
3.931 0.115 7 1
Heterogeneity
1.087 0.037 1.765 0

Macroinvertebrate richness

Far west near Northern Territory border, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

High substrate heterogeneity and the availability of hard substrate is likely to contribute to high macroinvertebrate diversity in the Western Cape and Gulf FBP.
There are significant correlations in this FBP between macroinvertebrate sample richness in edge and riffle habitat for both substrate heterogeneity and number of substrate classes present.

Table: Results of Pearson’s correlations between substrate heterogeneity and number of substrate classes present with macroinvertebrate sample richness from ABMAP reference sites in the Wet Tropics FBP. Significant p values (<0.05) are indicated in italics.
Habitat r p
Pool ( n = 42) Heterogeneity 0.10 0.27
No. classes 0.15 0.10
Edge ( n = 48) Heterogeneity 0.14 0.03
No. classes 0.12 0.05
Riffle ( n = 10) Heterogeneity 0.36 <0.001
No. classes 0.33 <0.001

Macroinvertebrate richness

Woody debris and snags

Woody debris, Photo by Water Planning Ecology Group, DSITIA

State of the Rivers survey data from 221 reference sites in the FBP show that on average there are approximately 56 items of LWD and snags per kilometre of river, which cover about 7-9% of the river bed.  Large woody debris (LWD) density is made up primarily of individual logs, branches, and small branch piles. 

Patches of leaf litter and twigs cover on average 14% of the stream bed with 13-16 patches per kilometre of river. This can range however from no patches to 180 with 100% bed cover.

 

Woody debris and snags

Methods

Mean SE Maximum Minimum
Woody debris density
Total LWD & snag density (km-1) 55.967 4.305 320 0
Leaf and twig patch density (km-1) 41.728 3.151 180 0
Individual log density (km-1) 14.428 1.619 200 0
Log jam (< 50% dense) density (km-1) 3.628 0.719 70 0
Log jam (> 50% dense) density (km-1) 2.060 1.530 300 0
Individual branch density (km-1) 16.677 2.333 180 0
Branch pile (< 50% dense) density (km-1) 12.841 1.733 93 0
Branch pile (> 50% dense) density (km-1) 6.332 1.295 120 0
Woody debris cover
Total LWD & snag cover (%) 8.312 0.711 45 0
Leaf and twig patch cover (%) 14.149 1.230 100 0
Individual log cover (%) 2.158 0.242 20 0
Log jam (< 50% dense) cover (%) 0.964 0.249 40 0
Log jam (> 50% dense) cover (%) 0.176 0.075 10 0
Individual branch cover (%) 1.968 0.285 25 0
Branch pile (< 50% dense) cover (%) 2.136 0.289 25 0
Branch pile (> 50% dense) cover (%) 0.910 0.225 30 0

References

  1. ^ a b ANRA (2002), Australian Natural Resources Atlas. [online], ANRA. Available at: https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/australian-natural-resources-atlas-anra.

Last updated: 22 March 2013

This page should be cited as:

Department of Environment, Science and Innovation, Queensland (2013) Western Cape and Gulf Freshwater Biogeographic Province – Habitat, WetlandInfo website, accessed 20 December 2024. Available at: https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/ecology/aquatic-ecosystems-natural/riverine/freshwater-biogeo/western-cape-and-gulf/habitat.html

Queensland Government
WetlandInfo   —   Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation