Wetland vegetation can be dominated by trees, a heath/shrub layer or a ground layer, consisting of either grasses, sedges, herbs or a combination of these in their riparian zones or in shallow aquatic areas. Submerged aquatic vegetation is found in deeper wetland areas. This is particularly relevant for palustrine wetlands which are defined as being dominated by vegetation, however, all other wetland systems can and most often do include a vegetation component that plays an important role in the wetland food web and physico-chemical environment.

Shade

Depending on the composition of the riparian zone it may provide ample shade for the water, reducing the amount of light and heat reaching a stream. For some provinces (e.g. Murray-Darling and Central), the sparse vegetation in the riparian zone does not give much shade. In other systems the reduction in light results in a reduction in the abundance and possibly species richness of algae and macrophytes that may otherwise be present, ultimately decreasing in-stream primary production as well as water temperature. These shading effects are more influential in the upper reaches of a stream system where the stream channel is narrow. The effect of shade on temperature in large, wide channels may be negligible. Fish utilise shade as an area of cover from which to launch predatory attacks, as well as a refuge from predation[10].

Pusey and Arthington (2003)[2] suggest that increased rates of transfer of thermal energy between the atmosphere and stream in the absence of an intact riparian zone may disrupt reproduction of fish, and have direct effects on mortality rates, body morphology, disease resistance and metabolic rates in fish.

Riparian vegetation influences the spectral qualities of light entering the stream[10]. Changes in light quality can lead to increased mortality of fish eggs and larvae due to increased ultraviolet light irradiation, reduction in the ability of adult fish to discriminate between potential mates, and increased conspicuousness to predators[10].

Nutrient and debris inputs

Both direct and indirect inputs are provided to the stream by riparian vegetation. Depending on the type of riparian vegetation it may deposit fruits, leaves, bark, large woody debris and/or snags into the stream. These inputs supply nutrients to the stream food chain. Terrestrially derived matter is consumed directly by some fish[10] and macroinvertebrates, and may be an important source of energy to some systems. It should be noted that in some systems (e.g. those dominated by grasses) the riparian zone may not provide many nutrients to the water.

When leaves derived from riparian vegetation first enter a stream, the soluble components undergo leaching. Fungi and bacteria then condition the leaf material, before macroinvertebrate shredders consume fragments of the leaves. The seasonality of leaf inputs, the volume, and the chemical composition of the leaves are determined by the species that occur in the riparian zone. Native vegetation, such as species of Eucalyptus, Acacia, and Melaleuca, have sclerophyllous leaves, which may persist for months or years before completely breaking down. Herbaceous material, such as grass litter, breaks down very quickly in streams. A sclerophyllous input ensures a continuous food resource for stream organisms, whereas herbaceous inputs may not be as consistent throughout the year[11]. Riparian zones dominated by exotic vegetation such as the willow (Salix sp.) supply an autumn-dominated energy input to the adjacent stream, providing only a brief food supply for aquatic organisms[4]. Litter fall in Australian forests tends to be continuous throughout the year, with a peak in summer[6][7][3]. Some streams in Queensland are fringed by the exotic camphor laurel (Cinnamomum camphora), the leaves of which contain camphor, camphorene, and reticuline, which may be unpalatable to stream consumers[5]. As a result, these leaves take a significant period of time to break down[11].

Debris from riparian vegetation provides habitat for stream organisms, e.g. the caddis fly larvae (Calamoceratidae) binds pieces of leaf material together to produce a mobile home. Some Leptoceridae, another type of caddis fly larvae, utilise hollowed-out sticks derived from riparian vegetation. Leaves, bark, large woody debris and snags also provide cover for fish and macroinvertebrates, and are a substrate for diatom and algal attachment.

Riparian vegetation influences the interception, storage and release of terrestrial nutrients. The riparian zone acts like a 'filter', reducing the amount of nutrients and suspended sediments carried in run-off destined for the stream. Additionally, riparian zones can minimise flood peaks following heavy rainfall[1]. Micro-biological processes, such as denitrification, occur in the riparian zone.

Habitat

Vegetation in the riparian zone, such as grasses, can provide spawning habitat for fish when inundated. The velocity of flood water can be slowed by large woody debris and trees forming eddies and backwaters, which may also provide favourable spawning sites for fish that are cued to spawn during high flows.

Vegetation provides habitat for terrestrial insects, which indirectly results in inputs to the stream when these insects drop from overhanging vegetation into the water and become food for other invertebrates, fish and turtles. Some of these insects may have originated from the stream. Many insects encountered in a stream are larval or immature, and they eventually emerge from the water as winged adults. The riparian zone provides a corridor for the movement and dispersal of these winged adult insects. The distributional patterns of riparian flying insects are influenced by the density of riparian vegetation, and can vary with height, distance from the stream, and season.

Riparian vegetation provides nesting sites for waterbirds. Flooded lignum (Muehlenbeckia florulenta), for example, is an important nesting habitat for waterbirds including colonial waterbirds and the freckled duck[13].

Bank stabilisation

Riparian vegetation also serves the function of bank stabilisation, reducing erosion. The roots of riparian plants bind the stream bank and help to reduce slumping, allowing the bank to become undercut without collapsing[1]. These under-cut areas are habitat for fish and macroinvertebrates, and exposed tree roots may be used as a spawning substrate for fish[9].

Woody debris and snags

Large woody debris (LWD) refers to whole trees, logs, branches and sticks that have fallen into rivers and streams. Snags are large complex accumulations of LWD. Once fallen into rivers evidence from elsewhere indicates LWD can persist for hundreds or even up to thousands of years[8].

LWD provides habitat for many aquatic organisms[12]. It provides a hard substrate for the colonisation of many species of bacteria, fungi and algae which form complex encrusting biofilms, essential components of carbon and nutrient pathways in aquatic systems. It is an important habitat for aquatic invertebrates and typically supports specific assemblages different from the fauna of other habitat types. Some species use the wood as a hard attachment site to filter feed, but most species feed upon the encrusting biofilms or occasionally the wood itself. Some macroinvertebrate species also use LWD as a hard substrate on which to attach eggs. LWD is also a major habitat for many species of fish and is the major habitat in rivers with low substrate heterogeneity and without other forms of complex habitat structure. Fish utilise LWD and snags to avoid predators, shelter from direct sunlight, avoid high water velocities, as ambush sites used by predators to capture their prey, as territorial markers, as spawning sites for adhering eggs and as both adult and juvenile habitat. Snags also provide habitat for birds, turtles, frogs and aquatic mammals.

In sand or silt dominated rivers, LWD can provide the only stable substrate for biota, particularly during periods of high velocity flows. In intermittently flowing rivers LWD can act as a drought refuge permitting the persistence of some species during dry spells.

---

References

1. ^ a b Arthington, AH, Marshall, JC, Rayment, GE, Hunter, HM & Bunn, SE (1997), 'Potential impact of sugarcane production on riparian and freshwater environments', Intensive sugarcane production: Meeting the challenges beyond 2000, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, ed. Keating, B. A. and Wilson, J. R..
2. ^ Arthington, AH & Pusey, BJ (December 2003), 'Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers', River Research and Applications, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 377-395.
3. ^ Bunn, SE (1988), 'Processing of leaf litter in a northern jarrah forest stream, Western Australia: I. Seasonal Differences', Hydrobiologia, vol. 162, pp. 201-210.
4. ^ Frankenberg, J (1992), 'The Use of Vegetation for River Bank Stability', Greening Australia. Catchments are green: a national conference on vegetation and water management, Canberra, pp. 139-144.
5. ^ Jantan, I, Ali, RM & Hock, GS (1992), 'Toxic and anti-fungal properties of the essential oils of Cinnamomum species from Peninsula Malaysia', Journal of Tropical Forest Science, vol. 6, pp. 286-292, Institut Penyelidikan Perhutanan Malaysia.
6. ^ Lake, PS (1982), 'Jolly Award Address. Ecology of the Macroinvertebrates of Australian Upland Streams – a Review of Current Knowledge', Bulletin of the Australian Society of Limnology, vol. 8, pp. 1-15, Australian Society of Limnology.
7. ^ Lake, PS, Barmuta, LA, Boulton, AJ, Campbell, IC & St Clair, RM (1985), 'Australian streams and Northern Hemisphere stream ecology: comparisons and problems', Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia, vol. 14, pp. 61-82, Ecological Society of Australia.
8. ^ Nanson, GC, Barbetti, M & Taylor, G (1995), 'River stabilisation due to changing climate and vegetation during the late Quaternary in Western Tasmania, Australia', Geomorphology, vol. 13, pp. 145-158, Elsevier.
9. ^ Pusey, BJ, Arthington, AH, Bird, JR & Close, PG (2001), 'Reproduction in three species of rainbowfish (Melanotaeniidae) from rainforest streams in northern Queensland, Australia', Ecology of Freshwater Fishes, vol. 10, pp. 75-87, Wiley.
10. ^ a b c d Pusey, BJ & Arthington, AH (2003), 'Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review', Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 54, pp. 1-16, CSIRO.
11. ^ a b Steward, AL (2000), Breakdown of native and exotic leaf litter in streams within a subtropical catchment, Department of Botany, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
12. ^ Treadwell, S, Koehn, J & Bunn, SE (2002), 'Large woody debris and other aquatic habitat', Riparian Land Management Guidelines, Volume One: Part A: Principles of Sound Management, Land and Water Australia, Canberra, Australia, ed. Lovett, S., Price, P..
13. ^ Young, WJ (2001), Rivers as Ecological Systems: The Murray-Darling Basin, CSIRO Land and Water, Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.

Last updated: 22 March 2013