Skip links and keyboard navigation

Terrain slope

Terrain slope is defined as the rise and fall of the terrain surface, also known as its inclination or gradient[5]. Slope is a driver and modifier of energy both above and below the water and influences biotic diversity, distribution and the functional traits of those biota[2][6][16].

Tukkee Warroo (Indian Head) on K’gari (Fraser Island). Photo by Linda Behrendorff QPWS

Quick facts

Steep slopes
in combination with strong currents or wave action, require structural macrobiota to be strongly attached to the substrate in order to survive and so the food must come to them.

Why is terrain slope important?

Slope is frequently used in combination with other terrain attributes such as benthic depth, roughness, and morphology to classify and allocate types to morphological features of the sea floor and their structural macrobiota[11]. The term slope can be applied to describe a morphological feature, e.g. the ‘shelf break’ is a very steep slope at the edge of the continental shelf, and beyond it the ‘continental slope’ marks a less steeply inclined area between the shelf break and abyssal plain (gently inclined or flat).

On land and intertidally, under the force of gravity, water moves from higher to lower elevation, transporting sediment and dissolved material. Its rate of movement is determined by a number of factors including the terrain slope, as the water will flow faster the steeper the slope, and the roughness of the terrain[5]. The speed and rate at which water moves through the terrain has implications for erosion, deposition, drainage and runoff, infiltration, and a range of other hydrological processes[18]. Sediment is transported by gravity, wind, wave, tidal and other current action and slope influences the rate at which this happens. On land, the rate of soil loss is proportionate to the steepness and length of a slope[23][26].

A steeply sloping low (wave) energy shoreline of coffee rock beneath sand, along the coast of K’gari (Fraser Island) within the Great Sandy Strait. Riverine and strong tidal current flows have undercut the steep banks such that the softer, intermediately consolidated coffee rocks tumble down, forming boulder fields subtidally. Photo by Maria Zann

Steep terrain slopes are commonly encountered in subtidal areas, as the effects of gravity are lessened by the buoyancy of water counteracting the gravitational force (Archimedes’ Principle). The energy of the water interacts with the terrain, driving geomorphological and hydrological processes[24]. Riverine, wave and tidal currents are capable of modifying terrain slopes and displacing sediment to form cliffs, channels, caverns and dunes[25]. In the intertidal area, the steepness of the beach face is an important attribute in coastal morphodynamic research, being related to hydrodynamic energy, grain size, and tidal range[20].

When manually delineating morphological features it is often easier to distinguish the features based on the rate of change of the slope e.g. the slope of the slope. For example rapid changes in slope mark the tops and sides of ridges, edges of channels and pits (terrain morphology). Changes in slope at different scales inform the characterisation of morphological features, benthic habitat types and geomorphological processes, from the habitat scale (e.g. coffee rock ledges) to the regional scale (e.g. the shelf break). Rapid changes of slope may originate from differences in substrate (e.g. consolidated substrates such as reefs), energy sources and magnitudes (e.g. wave-cut platforms, riverine eroded channels), and/or indicate different sea level histories and associated geomorphological processes of erosion and deposition.

‘Reef slope’ is the steepest part of the seaward section of a coral reef[8]. On a coral reef, the shallow reef slope is frequently the standard location for surveying representative areas of coral cover as an indicator of active coral reef building (e.g. Van Woesik and Done[19]). The elevation of coral reefs can be a marker of the current and previous position of sea levels over the last 20,000 years. Some reefs drowned, while others kept pace with sea level rise[22][8]. Very steep slopes of unconsolidated substrates may result in undersea landslides, forming similar morphological structures seen on land (e.g. fans) and even result in tsunamis capable of having far reaching effects on shorelines. Submarine landslides that occur on slopes are capable of transporting vast amounts of sediment from the continental shelf to the deep sea floor, even changing continental margins[21].


Modifed after Webster[21]


Often the steepest sloping terrains are consolidated, providing substrate for biota to attach. Steep canyon walls are hotspots of biodiversity, due to internal waves that move between the different density layers along the shelf edges breaking against them, resuspending and concentrating food particles for heterotrophic benthic animals to feed[15]. The steepness of the slope of a morphological feature correlates with the distribution of different benthic communities and may delineate the boundaries of that feature[17][1]. Changes in slopes are often used to delineate boundaries of morphological features, e.g. channels and depressions at a range of scales, for example tidal channels visible at the habitat scale through to seascape scale passages and drowned river valleys on the continental shelf.

A good example of the importance of slope can be seen in biotic differences that characterise certain reefs with different terrain slopes. Steeply sloping mesophotic reefs receive some protection from sediment raining down from above, and are characterised as distinctly different ecosystems inhabited by different, more diverse taxa than that of adjacent flat-topped mesophotic reefs[3]. Changes in slope on the edge of the continental shelf reveal terraces that represent previous sea levels and associated fringing reef growth (now mesophotic reefs) that align with interglacial rises and falls in sea levels[3][4][13][22].

Measuring terrain slope

Traditionally slope was surveyed across shorelines using a tape, stick and level (e.g. dumpy level). Slope can be measured a number of different ways: (i) degrees, (ii) percentage, or (iii) geometrically as a tangent ratio, expressed as the change in elevation vertically over the change in elevation horizontally (e.g. 1 in 10[18][5]). It is difficult to generalise on slope thresholds, as they are dependent on the scale of measurement, and thus relevant slope thresholds for marine and intertidal environment are difficult to find within the literature. Terrestrial slope thresholds relate to landform, geomorphological and soil formation processes, also relevant to the intertidal area[22]. Slope is used in digital soil process modelling, catchment delineation, hydrological surface flow and other terrain modelling, forming the basis for many topographic derivatives[12][9].

It is possible to calculate slope based on digital terrain models derived from remote sensing methods e.g. intertidally using LiDAR and drones, subtidally with satellite derived bathymetry, sonar and light ranging method such as bathymetric LiDAR. Metrics of slope may be derived from digital terrain models in a number of different ways[10]. Slope variability can be sampled statistically within a given area or analysis window, calculating average or mean, or standard deviation when modelling terrain attributes[7]. Increasing ruggedness or topographic complexity results in greater variability in slope, in which case other attributes (and metrics) which consider local variation provide more information about the terrain[10].

Queensland Intertidal and Subtidal Classification Scheme

The slope categories of seascape and habitat in the Intertidal and Subtidal Classification Scheme and their thresholds (see table below) are directly based on Speight’s landform pattern and element (scales) respectively and the thresholds in degrees, percentage and tangent are similar to Table 2 of the Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook[18][14]. Within the intertidal and subtidal zones, slope categories or resolution of categories are different – appropriately dealt with via typologies applied to the attributes.













Very gently inclined – 1

Very gently inclined



Very gently inclined – 2

Gently inclined - 1

Gently inclined

Gently inclined - 2

Moderately inclined - 1

Moderately inclined

Moderately inclined - 2





Very steep

Very steep



Near vertical

Near vertical



Suggest thresholds for slope are:

Level (<= 0°35')

Very gently inclined – 1 (0°35' - 1°)

Very gently inclined – 2 (1° - 1°45')

Gently inclined - 1 (1°45' - 3°15')

Gently inclined - 2 (3°15' - 5°45')

Moderately inclined - 1 (5°45' - 10°15')

Moderately inclined - 2 (10°15' - 18°)

Steep (18° - 30°)

Very steep (30° - 45°)

Precipitous (45° - 72°)

Cliffed (> 72°)

(these values are applicable for the habitat level. For higher levels the thresholds would be grouped as per the categories shown in the preceding table)


  1. ^ Beaman, RobinJ & Harris, PeterJ 2007, Geophysical variables as predictors of megabenthos assemblages from the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Geological Association of Canada.
  2. ^ Bennett, I & Pope, EC 1952, 'Intertidal zonation of the exposed rocky shores of Victoria, together with a rearrangement of the biogeographical provinces of temperate Australian shores', Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 105-159.
  3. ^ a b Bridge, TCL, Done, TJ, Beaman, RJ, Friedman, A, Williams, SB, Pizarro, O & Webster, JM 2011, 'Topography, substratum and benthic macrofaunal relationships on a tropical mesophotic shelf margin, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia', Coral Reefs, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 143-153.
  4. ^ Bridge, Tom & Guinotte, John 2013, Mesophotic coral reef ecosystems in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage area: their potential distribution and possible role as refugia from disturbance, viewed 21 March 2019, <>.
  5. ^ a b c Brouwer, C, Goffeau, A & Heibloem, M 1985, 'Chapter 3 - Elements of Topography', in Irrigation Water Management: Training Manual No. 1 - Introduction to Irrigation, FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, viewed 11 June 2020, <>.
  6. ^ Endean, R, Kenny, R & Stephenson, W 1956, 'The Ecology and Distribution of Intertidal Organisms on the Rocky Shores of the Queensland Mainland', Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 88, viewed 30 April 2019, <>.
  7. ^ Grohmann, CarlosHenrique, Smith, MikeJ & Riccomini, Claudio April 2011, 'Multiscale Analysis of Topographic Surface Roughness in the Midland Valley, Scotland', IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1200-1213, viewed 11 June 2020, <>.
  8. ^ a b Hopley, David, Smithers, ScottG & Parnell, Kevin 2007, The geomorphology of the Great Barrier Reef: development, diversity and change, Cambridge University Press.
  9. ^ Kumar, Manoj, Kumar, Rohitashw, Singh, PK, Singh, Manjeet, Yadav, KK & Mittal, HK 1 October 2015, 'Catchment delineation and morphometric analysis using geographical information system', Water Science and Technology, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1168-1175, viewed 10 June 2020, <>.
  10. ^ a b Lecours, Vincent, Devillers, Rodolphe, Simms, AlvinE, Lucieer, VanessaL & Brown, CraigJ 2017, 'Towards a framework for terrain attribute selection in environmental studies', Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 89, pp. 19-30, Elsevier.
  11. ^ Linklater, Michelle, Jordan, AlanR, Carroll, AndrewG, Neilson, Joseph, Gudge, Sallyann, Brooke, BrendanP, Nichol, ScottL, Hamylton, SarahM & Woodroffe, ColinD 2019, 'Mesophotic corals on the subtropical shelves of Lord Howe Island and Balls Pyramid, south-western Pacific Ocean', Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 70, no. 1, p. 43, viewed 25 March 2019, <>.
  12. ^ McBratney, AlexB, Mendonça Santos, MdeL & Minasny, B1 2003, 'On digital soil mapping', Geoderma, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 3-52, Elsevier.
  13. ^ Muir, PaulR, Wallace, CardenC, Pichon, Michel & Bongaerts, Pim 19 December 2018, 'High species richness and lineage diversity of reef corals in the mesophotic zone', Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 285, no. 1893, p. 20181987, viewed 19 March 2019, <>.
  14. ^ National Committee for Soil. 2007, Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook., CSIRO PUBLISHING, Collingwood, VIC.
  15. ^ Pearman, TRR, Robert, K, Callaway, A, Hall, R, Lo Iacono, C & Huvenne, VAI May 2020, 'Improving the predictive capability of benthic species distribution models by incorporating oceanographic data – Towards holistic ecological modelling of a submarine canyon', Progress in Oceanography, vol. 184, p. 102338, viewed 11 June 2020, <>.
  16. ^ Poloczanska, ElviraS, Smith, Sam, Fauconnet, Laurence, Healy, John, Tibbetts, IanR, Burrows, MichaelT & Richardson, AnthonyJ 2011, 'Little change in the distribution of rocky shore faunal communities on the Australian east coast after 50years of rapid warming', Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, vol. 400, no. 1, pp. 145-154, Elsevier.
  17. ^ Richmond, S & Stevens, T 2014, 'Classifying benthic biotopes on sub-tropical continental shelf reefs: How useful are abiotic surrogates?', Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 138, pp. 79-89.
  18. ^ a b c Speight, JG & McDonald, RC 1990, Australian soil and land survey handbook: guidelines for conducting surveys., Inkata Press, Melbourne, ed. R C McDonald.
  19. ^ Van Woesik, R & Done, TJ 1997, 'Coral communities and reef growth in the southern Great Barrier Reef', Coral Reefs, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 103-115, Springer.
  20. ^ Vos, Kilian, Harley, MitchellDean, Splinter, Kristen, Walker, Andrew & Turner, IanL 23 April 2020, Beach slopes from satellite-derived shorelines, Oceanography, viewed 11 June 2020, <>.
  21. ^ a b Webster, JodyM, George, NicholasPJ, Beaman, RobinJ, Hill, Jon, Puga-Bernabéu, Ángel, Hinestrosa, Gustavo, Abbey, ElizabethA & Daniell, JamesJ January 2016, 'Submarine landslides on the Great Barrier Reef shelf edge and upper slope: A mechanism for generating tsunamis on the north-east Australian coast?', Marine Geology, vol. 371, pp. 120-129, viewed 10 June 2020, <>.
  22. ^ a b c Webster, JodyM, Braga, JuanCarlos, Humblet, Marc, Potts, DonaldC, Iryu, Yasufumi, Yokoyama, Yusuke, Fujita, Kazuhiko, Bourillot, Raphael, Esat, TezerM, Fallon, Stewart, Thompson, WilliamG, Thomas, AlexanderL, Kan, Hironobu, McGregor, HelenV, Hinestrosa, Gustavo, Obrochta, StephenP & Lougheed, BryanC June 2018, 'Response of the Great Barrier Reef to sea-level and environmental changes over the past 30,000 years', Nature Geoscience, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 426-432, viewed 25 March 2019, <>.
  23. ^ Wischmeier, WH & Smith, DD 1978, Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning, vol. Agriculture Handbook No. 537, Washington, D.C..
  24. ^ Wolanski, E 2001, Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs. Physical and Biological Links in the Great Barrier Reef, CRC Press, Boca Raton, ed. E Wolanski.
  25. ^ Woodroffe, ColinD 2002, Coasts: form, process and evolution, Cambridge University Press.
  26. ^ Yang, Xihua 2014, 'Deriving RUSLE cover factor from time-series fractional vegetation cover for hillslope erosion modelling in New South Wales', Soil Research, vol. 52, no. 3, p. 253, viewed 17 July 2020, <>.

Last updated: 22 July 2020

This page should be cited as:

Terrain slope, WetlandInfo 2020, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland, viewed 4 August 2020, <>.

Queensland Government
WetlandInfo   —   Department of Environment and Science